You are here

Methodology
Learn more about the

QS Asia University Rankings 2018

.

Now featuring over 400 universities, the QS Asia University Rankings 2018 highlights the best universities in this region. Two universities from Singapore lead the way at the top of this year’s Asia University Rankings, with Nanyang Technological University (NTU) pipping last year’s number one university — National University of Singapore (NUS) — to first place. In the rest of the top 10, Hong Kong is the most represented country with four universities featured.

17 different countries are represented in this year’s ranking, with five represented at least once in the top 20. Those countries are: Singapore, Hong Kong, South Korea, China and Japan. For a more in-depth look at this year’s Asia University Rankings results, download our free supplement, available here.

Want to share your thoughts on this year’s ranking? Tweet us @TopUnis.

Published annually since 2009, the QS Asia University Rankings highlights the top universities in Asia each year. The methodology used to create the ranking is similar to that used for the QS World University Rankings®, but with some additional indicators and adapted weightings.This set of criteria, developed in consultation with regional experts and stakeholders, is designed to reflect key priorities for universities in Asia, drawing on as much available data as possible. Find out more from the QS Intelligence Unit.

The 10 indicators used to compile the QS Asia University Rankings are as follows:

 

Academic reputation (30%)

This is assessed using data from the large global survey of academics conducted by QS each year. The results of this survey, which asks academics to identify the leading universities in their own subject area, also feed into other rankings and reports produced by QS, including the QS World University Rankings and the QS World University Rankings by Subject. The aim is to give an indication of which universities hold the strongest reputation within the international academic community.

Employer reputation (20%)

This is again assessed using the results of a major international survey, this time of graduate employers, who are asked to identify the universities they perceive as producing the highest-quality graduates. The results of this survey are used to inform a number of other QS research projects, reflecting the importance of employability and employment prospects for today’s university applicants and graduates.

Faculty/student ratio (15%) 

This indicator assesses the ratio of full-time academic staff members employed per student enrolled. The aim is to give an idea of how much contact time and academic support students at the institution may expect to receive.

Citations per paper (10%) and papers per faculty (10%)

These two indicators are both assessed using data from the Scopus database of research publications and citations. The first assesses the number of citations per research paper published, aiming to give an idea of the impact each institution’s research is having within the research community. The second assesses the number of research papers published per faculty member. This provides an indication of the overall research productivity of the university.

Staff with a PhD (5%)

A new indicator introduced to the QS University Rankings: Asia for 2016, this assesses the proportion of academic staff members qualified to PhD level. This complements the faculty/student ratio indidator, both aiming to provide proxy measures of an institution's commitment to high-quality teaching.

Proportion of international faculty (2.5%) and proportion of international students (2.5%)

The final four indicators all aim to assess how ‘international’ each university is, reflecting the fact that internationalization is a major priority both for universities in Asia and in every world region. These two indicators, also used in the QS World University Rankings, assess the proportion of staff and students at the university who are classed as ‘international’.

Proportion of inbound exchange students (2.5%) and proportion of outbound exchange students (2.5%)

These last two indicators, not used in the global ranking, offer additional insights into the internationalization activity at universities in Asia, assessing the relative size of each institution’s inbound and outbound student exchange programs.

The overall results of the QS Asia Univeristy Rankings are published in an interactive online table, which allows users to compare universities’ performance on individual indicators, or view those with the highest combined scores. To access the full functionality of the table, you first need to log in or register as a site member – this is free and allows you to access exclusive content and resources.

QS Staff Writer's profile image
Written by QS Staff Writer

See related categories:

Want to leave a comment?

Please login or register to post
comment above our articles

6 Comments

Hi, do the changes in World University Ranking 2018, 1) QS have altered the window to exclude the year in which the table is published, 2) Previously, international responses were weighted at 70%, with domestic responses contributing 30% of the total score for this metric, also applied to the methodology used for Asia University Ranking in this year? Many thanks.

Hi, on your ranking list, Some of the indicators' score of some university are left blank. Does it mean that the score the university got is zero? or it's too low to be calculated or....? Can you please tell me why some scores are left vacant?

Hi, can you help me in understanding how ranking framework actually works in QS?

Hi Dr Priyanka, you can find out more on the QS Intelligence Unit website. 

Hi can you please explain how a university can receive a score for a number of indicators, but than have an overall rank of N/A. What are the requirements to receive a rank?
Also are there 9 or 10 indicators cause on the methodology page it has 10 but said that 9 are used to calculate the score?

Hi Emily, to be eligible, a university must teach at both undergraduate and postgraduate level, and be active in multiple subject areas. If you'd like to ask about a specific university, you could email us at [email protected] Sorry for the confusion regarding the number of indicators - there are 10 this year, as the 'Staff with PhD indicator' is new to the 2016 ranking. This error has now been corrected. :)

WANT TO STUDY
IN ASIA?
See Country Guides

Want more detail?

Get indepth info