Home
University Ranking Articles
World University Rankings
World University Ranking Methodologies Compared
Thanks for visiting TopUniversities.com today! So that we can show you the most relevant information, please select the option that most closely relates to you.
Your input will help us improve your experience.
Your input will help us improve your experience.You can close this popup to continue using the website or choose an option below to register in or login.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up free to keep exploring.
Access unlimited articles and study guides
Discover top subjects and destinations
Get the personalised guidance you need to succeed
By signing up I agree to share my data and according to
User agreement, Cookie policy and Privacy policy.
Ask me about universities, programs, or rankings!
Our chatbot is here to guide you.
We use Necessary cookies to make our website work. We’d also like to set optional Functional cookies to gather anonymous site visitation data and Advertising cookies to help us understand which content our visitors value the most. By enabling these cookies, you can help us provide a better website for you. These will be set only if you accept.More information about the cookies we use can be found here Cookies Policy
Views
World University Ranking Methodologies Compared
Laura Bridgestock
Updated Apr 19, 2021Save
Share
Share via
Share this Page
Table of contents
Table of contents
There are multiple world university rankings available – with the best-known being the QS World University Rankings®, Times Higher Education World University Rankings, and the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) – and each one uses a different methodology. This can sometimes be confusing, as it’s not always easy to see why a university is ranked differently, or why the order within a country changes depending on which table you view.
To clarify how these different outcomes are reached, below is an overview of the methodologies used for these three major world university rankings…
QS World University Rankings®
The QS World University Rankings assesses universities on six performance indicators, relating to research, teaching, employability and internationalization. To be eligible for inclusion, institutions must teach at both undergraduate and postgraduate level, and conduct work in at least two of five broad faculty areas (arts and humanities; engineering and technology; social sciences and management; natural sciences; life sciences and medicine).
Based on a global survey of academics, who are asked to identify the leading institutions in their field.
Based on a global survey of graduate employers, who are asked to identify the institutions producing the best graduates in their sector.
An indication of commitment to high-quality teaching and support.
This is normalized by subject area, and reflects the impact of an institution’s research.
A measure of an institution’s success in attracting faculty from overseas.
A measure of an institution’s success in attracting students from overseas.
The interactive results table can be filtered to show the scores for each of these six indicators, showing where each institution’s comparative strengths and weaknesses lie. You can find out more about the QS World University Rankings methodology here.
Times Higher Education World University Rankings
The Times Higher Education World University Rankings uses 13 performance indicators, grouped into five categories. Institutions are excluded if they do not teach at undergraduate level, or if their research output is below a certain threshold.
Based on a reputation survey (15%), staff-to-student ratio (4.5%), doctorate-to-bachelor’s ratio (2.25%), doctorates-awarded-to-academic-staff ratio (6%) and institutional income (2.25%).
Based on a reputation survey (18%), research income (6%) and research papers published per faculty member (6%).
Based on the number of citations a university’s research obtains, normalized by subject area.
Based on international-to-domestic-student ratio (2.5%), international-to-domestic-staff ratio (2.5%) and international research collaborations (2.5%).
Based on income earned from industry, relative to the number of academic staff employed, and adjusted for PPP.
The published results can be sorted to show universities’ scores for each of the five categories, but not for the individual indicators within each category.
Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU)
Also widely known as the Shanghai Ranking, the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) assesses six performance indicators, all relating to research excellence. The ranking considers all institutions with Nobel Laureates, Fields Medalists, highly cited researchers, papers published in Nature or Science, or a significant number of papers indexed by the Science Citation Index-Expanded (SCIE) or Social Science Citation Index (SSCI).
Based on the number of alumni of an institution who have won Nobel Prizes and Fields Medals, with greater weight given to more recent recipients.
Based on the number of staff affiliated with an institution who have won Nobel Prizes in physics, chemistry, medicine and economics, and Fields Medals in mathematics, with greater weight given to more recent recipients.
Based on an institution’s number of highly cited researchers, according to the latest list published by Thomson Reuters.
Based on the number of papers published in these two influential journals, drawing on a four-year period. For institutions specialized in social sciences and humanities, this category does not apply.
Based on the number of papers indexed in the Science Citation Index-Expanded and Social Science Citation Index in the preceding calendar year, with a double weighting for papers indexed in the Social Science Citation Index.
The weighted scores of the other indicators, divided by the number of full-time equivalent academic staff.
The published ARWU results can be sorted to show performance in each of these six indicators.
Got more questions about any of these world university rankings? Take a look at our frequently asked questions, or ask your own in the comments below.
This article was updated in June 2017.
Testimonials
+ 9 others
saved this article
+ 10 others saved this article
The former editor of TopUniversities.com, Laura oversaw the site's editorial content and student forums. She also edited the QS Top Grad School Guide and contributed to market research reports, including 'How Do Students Use Rankings?'
Recommended articles Last year
What is social sustainability?
Top universities in Australia
Top universities in Africa